New publication: SYRINA toolkit reduces ambiguity in interpreting evidence of endocrine disruptionOpen letter to EU Commission about proposed EDC CriteriaNew science journal Special Issue explores systematic review methods for assessing chemical risksUS scientists calculate TiO2 risk levels using SR approachNew set of recommendations for implementing SR in chemical risk assessment

About

This is the unofficial website for work at Lancaster University, investigating how systematic review methods can help scientists and policy-makers make best use of the best evidence in assessing and managing health risks posed by chemicals.

The site is maintained by Paul Whaley, a research consultant, Associate Editor for Systematic Reviews at Environment International, and part-time PhD student at Lancaster Environment Centre who may one day finish his studies.

Key Outputs

PublicationImplementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities, recommendations. (Open access.)

New. PFS Literature Review Appraisal Toolkit (June 25, 2014). Aiding the critical appraisal of literature reviews.

ReportEFSA Draft 2014 Opinion on BPA: A Critical Appraisal. (April 22, 2014). We identify major methodological obstacles to accepting that EFSA’s draft 2014 Opinion on BPA is a valid, maximally-useful synthesis of the evidence of BPA’s toxicity.

ReportSystematic Review and the future of evidence in chemicals policy (Nov 2013). Outlining how techniques from EBM may be applied to chemical safety assessment.

Latest News